7th Cir.

The Boldt Company v. Black & Veatch Construction, Inc.

The Boldt Company v. Black & Veatch Construction, Inc.

July 8, 2026 ·25-2003 ·Panel Decision ·Kirsch · By Raj Patel

The Seventh Circuit affirmed a jury verdict awarding nominal damages but reversed the grant of summary judgment on a wrongful termination claim. The court held that the subcontract was ambiguous regarding liability for delays and that a jury must decide whether adequate notice was provided.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:13

Background

Black & Veatch Construction, Inc. hired The Boldt Company as a subcontractor for a windfarm project in Illinois. The project fell behind schedule due to delays in parts delivery, unsuitable soil conditions, and equipment issues. Black & Veatch terminated Boldt for cause, and Boldt sued for wrongful termination and unpaid work. The district court granted summary judgment to Black & Veatch and later awarded Black & Veatch only nominal damages after a trial on damages.

The court’s reasoning

The Seventh Circuit reviewed the evidentiary rulings and jury instructions, finding no abuse of discretion. The court determined that the district court correctly instructed the jury on nominal damages under Illinois law. Regarding the summary judgment, the court found the subcontract ambiguous. While the contract required staying on schedule, it did not clearly establish that the subcontractor was responsible for all delays unless it provided specific notice. The court concluded that a jury must decide whether the parties intended to assign blame for delays absent notice and whether the notices provided were adequate.

What it means going forward

The case is remanded for further proceedings to determine if Boldt was wrongfully terminated. The nominal damages award for Black & Veatch remains in effect, but the liability issue is reopened for a jury trial.