Decisions

Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Jul 6 2026
7th Cir. 25-1891 Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANIEL SAMUEL ETA

The Seventh Circuit affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a manual border search of a defendant's cell phones. The court held that brief manual searches of electronic devices at the border are routine and do not require a warrant or individualized suspicion.

Jul 6 2026
7th Cir. 24-3170 Panel Decision

Dimitrios George Liapis v. Frank Bisignano

The Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court ruling denying disability benefits to a claimant with bipolar disorder and chronic pain. Although the Administrative Law Judge made multiple legal errors in evaluating a medical expert's opinion, the court found those errors harmless because the claimant could not meet the statutory threshold for disability.

Jul 6 2026
8th Cir. 26-1035 Panel Decision

Navashia Akins v. Checkr, Inc

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se action brought under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The court found no basis for reversal after reviewing the district court's decision de novo.

Jul 6 2026
7th Cir. 25-2268 Panel Decision

E.E.V. v. Blanche

The Seventh Circuit rejected the government's arguments to dismiss petitions for review filed by noncitizens seeking withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture relief. The court held that reinstatement orders are final orders of removal subject to judicial review and that the thirty-day filing deadline is subject to equitable tolling.

Jul 6 2026
11th Cir. 1:25-cr-00114-JB-MU-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Covington

The Eleventh Circuit granted appointed counsel's motion to withdraw from representing the defendant in a direct criminal appeal. The court affirmed the defendant's convictions and sentences after an independent review found no arguable issues of merit.

Jul 6 2026
5th Cir. 24-30651 Panel Decision

AbbVie, Incorporated v. Murrill

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling upholding Louisiana Act 358 against challenges from pharmaceutical manufacturers. The court held that the state law regulating contract pharmacy distribution is not preempted by federal law and does not violate constitutional provisions.