Decisions

Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

May 29 2026
9th Cir. 3:22-cv-00009-SLG Unpublished

HUMPHREY V. STRAUBE, ET AL.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a civil rights action alleging family integrity violations. The court held that the plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts showing defendants acted under color of state law or committed judicial deception.

May 29 2026
1st Cir. 24-1191 Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LUIS MIGUEL GARCÍA-TORRO

The First Circuit affirmed a forty-eight-month prison sentence for a defendant who violated a plea agreement by possessing a machinegun while on supervised release. The court held that the government did not breach its plea agreement by advocating for a high-end sentence within the agreed range while citing community violence concerns.

May 29 2026
9th Cir. 2:09-cr-00678-JAT-1 Unpublished

United States v. Raboy

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court order denying a defendant's motion for compassionate release. The appellate panel found no abuse of discretion in the lower court's conclusion that the defendant lacked extraordinary and compelling reasons for relief.

May 29 2026
10th Cir. 25-8037 Panel Decision

SJH 11 v. Dowbuilt

The Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court order denying a motion to compel arbitration. The court held that the arbitrator had already resolved the question of arbitrability, ruling that the plaintiff was not required to arbitrate certain claims against the defendant.

May 29 2026
9th Cir. 1:23-cr-02026-SAB-1 Unpublished

USA v. Franklin

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a thirty-year sentence imposed on a defendant convicted of child pornography offenses. The panel rejected arguments that the sentence was substantively unreasonable due to the consideration of pending state charges and the defendant's age and health.

May 29 2026
9th Cir. 2:24-cv-05420-VBF-AS Unpublished

Carrera v. County of Los Angeles

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a civil rights action brought by a pro se appellant against state court officials and a county. The court held that judicial immunity and the Eleventh Amendment barred claims against the judges and commissioner, while the complaint failed to state a plausible claim against the county.