Decisions

Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Jun 2 2026
4th Cir. 25-6985 Per Curiam

Jeffrey Mitchell v. Joseph Walters, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal challenging the timeliness of a state prisoner's habeas corpus petition. The court found the petitioner failed to demonstrate a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right required to obtain a certificate of appealability.

Jun 2 2026
5th Cir. 25-60216 Published

Clifton Jackson; Helen Noel; William Noel Plaintiffs— v. City of Jackson, Mississippi Defendant—

The Fifth Circuit vacated the district court's dismissal for lack of standing, finding that plaintiffs alleged a concrete economic injury from paying for unusable water. However, the court affirmed the dismissal for failure to state a claim, ruling that plaintiffs failed to allege constitutionally inadequate process for their billing disputes.

Jun 2 2026
5th Cir. 25-20408 Per Curiam

Sullivan v. Feldman

The Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court's amended judgment confirming four arbitration awards in a medical insurance dispute. The court held that the district court did not violate the mandate from a prior appeal by entering judgment before a subsequent arbitration resolved inconsistencies among the awards.

Jun 2 2026
4th Cir. 25-6983 Per Curiam

House v. Bremar

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a pro se complaint filed under Bivens. The appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's application of the screening statute.

May 29 2026
9th Cir. 1:25-cv-00546-SKO Unpublished

Williams v. Warden

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a federal prisoner's habeas corpus petition challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding. The court held that the prisoner failed to demonstrate any collateral consequences or abridged fundamental constitutional rights resulting from the timing of a disciplinary report.

May 29 2026
9th Cir. 2:21-cv-03349-JAK-PD Unpublished

SHAJI, ET AL. V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ET AL.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a foreclosure dispute brought by pro se appellants. The panel held that the plaintiffs failed to allege sufficient facts to support claims for wrongful foreclosure, negligence, breach of contract, and related causes of action.