Background
Jeffrey Olson leased a Jeep Grand Cherokee from a dealership and signed a lease agreement containing an arbitration clause with a delegation provision. He later became the named plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit alleging defects in the vehicle’s headrests against the manufacturer, FCA US, LLC. FCA was not a party to the lease agreement but moved to compel Olson to arbitrate his claims, arguing the delegation clause required the court to send the arbitrability question to an arbitrator.
The court’s reasoning
The panel held that with limited exceptions, non-parties to an arbitration agreement cannot enforce its terms against a signatory. The court found no clear and unmistakable evidence that Olson agreed to arbitrate with FCA, as the agreement expressly limited the scope to Olson and the dealership. The court rejected FCA’s reliance on Henry Schein, noting that case involved parties effectively treated as signatories and did not abrogate the general rule regarding non-signatories. Furthermore, under California law as clarified in Ford Motor Warranty Cases, FCA could not use equitable estoppel because Olson’s claims were founded in statutory rights separate from the lease agreement.
With limited exceptions, non-parties to an arbitration agreement cannot enforce the agreement’s terms against a signatory.
OLSON V. FCA US, LLC
What it means going forward
Manufacturers and other non-signatories cannot rely on delegation clauses in consumer contracts signed with third-party dealers to compel arbitration of disputes with consumers.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download