5th Cir.

Bello v. Fannin County Detention Center

March 17, 2026 ·25-40682 ·Per Curiam · By James Taylor

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a federal prisoner seeking legal aid forms. The court ruled the case was moot because the appellant was no longer confined at the facility he sued.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / --:--

Background

Olamide Olatayo Bello, a federal prisoner, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. He sought an order compelling the Fannin County Detention Center to provide him with various forms of legal aid. Bello moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in his appeal of the district court’s dismissal of that petition.

The court’s reasoning

The court noted that at the time Bello filed his mandamus petition, he was confined in the Fannin County Detention Center. However, records from the Bureau of Prisons indicated he was currently confined in the Federal Correction Institution in Seagoville, Texas. Because Bello was no longer confined at the Fannin County Detention Center, the relief he requested and the injury he alleged could not be redressed by a favorable appellate ruling. Consequently, the court determined the appeal was moot and lacked jurisdiction.

What it means going forward

Federal prisoners seeking mandamus relief against specific detention centers must ensure they remain confined at that facility to maintain a live controversy, or their appeals will be dismissed as moot upon transfer.

Play