5th Cir.

United States v. Nobbie

June 4, 2026 ·25-40022 ·Per Curiam · By James Taylor

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the conviction of a defendant charged with transporting an illegal alien. The court held that the totality of the circumstances supported the Border Patrol agent's reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle.

Background

Nyzhair Ahmir Emanuel Nobbie was convicted of transporting an illegal alien and conspiring to do the same under 8 U.S.C. Sections thirteen twenty-four. On appeal, he contended that the district court should have suppressed evidence of three illegal aliens discovered in his car during a roving Border Patrol stop.

The court’s reasoning

The court determined that the totality of the circumstances supported the agent’s reasonable suspicion that Nobbie was engaged in illegal conduct. The court cited United States v. Brignoni-Ponce and United States v. Jacquinot as the governing legal standards.

What it means going forward

The decision affirms the denial of a motion to suppress in roving Border Patrol stop cases where the totality of the circumstances supports reasonable suspicion.