5th Cir.

Murray v. LeBlanc

July 7, 2026 ·25-30076 ·Per Curiam · By Maria Santos

The Fifth Circuit dismissed an interlocutory appeal by Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections officials claiming qualified immunity. The court held that while it could review the legal question of authority under prior precedent, it lacked jurisdiction to resolve the factual disputes regarding the conditions of confinement.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:29

Background

Plaintiffs, pretrial detainees at Madison Parish Correctional Center, alleged they were assaulted by other inmates while awaiting trial. They sued DPSC officials LeBlanc and Smith, claiming the officials violated constitutional rights by failing to classify inmates, supervise them, or investigate assaults. The district court denied summary judgment for both sides, finding genuine issues of fact existed regarding the officials’ conduct and the conditions at the jail.

The court’s reasoning

The court explained that while denials of summary judgment based on qualified immunity are immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine, appellate review is limited to purely legal questions. The court cannot review the district court’s determination that genuine factual disputes exist. Here, the district court correctly applied Crittindon to find that DPSC officials had some authority over local jails housing DPSC prisoners. However, because the district court also found numerous factual disputes regarding the specific conditions and the officials’ actions, the Fifth Circuit lacked jurisdiction to resolve those facts and was compelled to dismiss the appeal.

What it means going forward

The case returns to the district court for trial on the merits, as the qualified immunity defense remains unresolved due to the existence of factual disputes.