5th Cir.

United States v. Abron

June 11, 2026 ·25-10705 ·Per Curiam · By James Taylor

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed an appeal after finding the record insufficient to evaluate a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The court granted the appointed attorney's motion to withdraw under Anders v. California procedures.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 0:56

Background

Mark Anthony Abron appealed a conviction from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. His appointed attorney moved to withdraw, filing briefs in accordance with Anders v. California and United States v. Flores, while Abron filed responses.

The court’s reasoning

The court determined the record was not sufficiently developed to allow a fair evaluation of Abron’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Consequently, the court declined to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. The court concurred with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presented no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

What it means going forward

The appeal is dismissed, and the defendant is barred from pursuing this specific ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal, though the claim remains available for collateral review.