Skip to content
Do It For The Caselaw
  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • About
  • Shop
  • Subscribe
Do It For The Caselaw
  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • About
  • Shop
  • Subscribe
Home / Decisions / United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit / Carlton H. Ingram v. Douglas A. Collins
Fed. Cir.

Carlton H. Ingram v. Douglas A. Collins

March 30, 2026 ·25-1972 ·Panel Decision · By Raj Patel

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed the appeal in this veterans benefits dispute. The parties agreed to the dismissal, and each side will bear its own costs.

Key takeaways

  • Holding: The court dismissed the appeal pursuant to the parties' agreement under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure forty-two, subsection B.
  • Standard: Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure forty-two, subsection B
  • Practical effect: The appeal is terminated without a decision on the merits, and the parties proceed with their own expenses.

Background

This case originated as an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. The appeal involved a dispute between Carlton H. Ingram, the claimant-appellee, and Douglas A. Collins, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

The court’s reasoning

The court issued an order stating that the parties had agreed to the dismissal. The court did not address the merits of the underlying veterans benefits claim.

What it means going forward

The appeal is terminated without a decision on the merits, and the parties proceed with their own expenses.

Civil Social Security

On this page

Background The court’s reasoning What it means going forward

Share

Related from this court

Jul 17, 2026 Kelly v. United States Jul 17, 2026 Schindler v. Squires Jul 16, 2026 SLINGSHOT PRINTING LLC v. CANON U.S.A., INC Jul 16, 2026 Murillo v. United States
Do It For The Caselaw

Just Do It For the Caselaw!

Site

  • Mission
  • The Anchors
  • Editorial Process
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Read & Listen

  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • The Weekly Brief

Follow

© 2026 Do It For The Caselaw. Not legal advice.