11th Cir.

In re: Ricki Blalock, Debtor. Ricki Blalock v. AMH 2014-2 Borrower, LP

June 2, 2026 ·1:24-cv-05990-JPB ·Per Curiam · By Maria Santos

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal from a bankruptcy stay order because the underlying Chapter thirteen case had been dismissed. The court concluded that it could not provide meaningful relief since the appeal was moot.

Background

The appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a Chapter thirteen petition for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court granted the appellee’s motion for relief from the automatic stay and subsequently dismissed the case. The district court dismissed the appellant’s appeal from the stay order as moot. The appellant then appealed that final order to the court of appeals.

The court’s reasoning

The court addressed a jurisdictional question regarding whether the appeal was moot given the dismissal of the underlying Chapter thirteen case. Neither party timely responded to the jurisdictional question. Upon review of the record, the court concluded that it could not provide meaningful relief because the dismissal of the underlying Chapter thirteen case rendered the appeal moot. The court cited Neidich v. Salas, 783 F.3d 1215, 1216 (11th Cir. 2015).

What it means going forward

The dismissal of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction leaves the district court’s dismissal of the appeal from the stay order in place, effectively ending the appellant’s ability to challenge the stay order through this appellate path.