11th Cir.

Solomon v. Mayor of City of Lauderhill

May 4, 2026 ·0:23-cv-62314-RS ·Per Curiam · By Maria Santos

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's second amended complaint as a shotgun pleading. The court held that the complaint failed to provide fair notice of claims and violated Federal Rules of Civil Procedure eight and ten.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:30

Background

Anna Solomon, proceeding pro se, appealed the district court’s dismissal of her second amended complaint with prejudice. The district court had previously struck two of her earlier complaints as shotgun pleadings and provided warnings that further failures to comply would result in dismissal.

The court’s reasoning

The court reviewed the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure eight and ten. It found the complaint replete with conclusory allegations not connected to specific causes of action and failing to separate claims into distinct counts. The complaint also incorporated allegations from one count into others, undermining the ability of defendants and the court to understand the claims. The district court had provided Solomon two additional chances to cure these deficiencies after detailed explanations of the errors.

What it means going forward

The decision reinforces the Eleventh Circuit’s strict tolerance for shotgun pleadings and confirms that dismissal with prejudice is a permissible remedy for pro se litigants who repeatedly fail to comply with court orders to correct deficient pleadings.

Play