Background
Wilfort Foster, III, appealed his convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and fentanyl, as well as money laundering. He argued that the district court imposed a procedurally and substantively unreasonable sentence. The government moved to dismiss the appeal based on a sentence appeal waiver in Foster’s plea agreement.
The court’s reasoning
The court reviewed the validity of the sentence appeal waiver de novo. It found that the record showed Foster knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. The plea agreement contained a Limited Waiver of Appeal that allowed direct appeals only for upward departures or variances above the sentencing guideline range, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, or if the government appealed the sentence. Foster signed a certification confirming he understood the terms, and the district court reiterated the waiver’s limitations during the plea colloquy and sentencing hearing. The court noted that Foster’s challenge regarding sentencing factors did not fit within the limited exceptions, as he was not claiming ineffective assistance, was sentenced below the guideline range, and the government had not appealed.
What it means going forward
Defendants who sign plea agreements with broad appeal waivers will likely find their appeals dismissed if their challenges do not fall within the narrow exceptions explicitly reserved in the waiver.