Background
Dr. K. Jeff Carney, a urologist at Emory University, was subjected to an internal investigation following complaints from medical residents regarding his professionalism and conduct. While the investigation found no cause for disciplinary action, it recommended that Dr. Carney engage in leadership coaching to improve his conflict resolution and communication skills. Dr. Carney refused to participate, viewing the requirement as an unlawful medical examination. Emory subsequently decided not to renew his appointment. Dr. Carney sued, alleging a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Emory.
The court’s reasoning
The court reviewed the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Dr. Carney. The Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits employers from requiring a medical examination unless it is job-related and consistent with business necessity. The court applied Equal Employment Opportunity Commission guidance, which defines a medical examination as a procedure seeking information about physical or mental impairments. The court found that the coaching ordered by Emory was specifically for navigating conflict and leadership, not for diagnosing a mental disorder. Although the coach asked questions about sleep and stress, these were general well-being inquiries appropriate after a significant life event like job loss. The court rejected Dr. Carney’s argument that the coach’s profession or the potential for medical services created a genuine issue of fact, noting that speculation is insufficient to defeat summary judgment.
What it means going forward
The decision clarifies that employers can mandate professional development and conflict-resolution coaching for employees without it being deemed a medical examination under the ADA, provided the coaching is not designed to diagnose a disability.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download