11th Cir.

United States v. Henriquez

April 27, 2026 ·1:23-cr-20385-CMA-2 ·Per Curiam · By James Taylor

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed convictions under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act for drug trafficking within a foreign nation's exclusive economic zone. The court rejected challenges regarding subject-matter jurisdiction, the vessel's nationality, and due process violations.

Background

Defendants Tony Rafael Henriquez, Jose Antonio Acosta-Pinedo, and Julio Javier Liriano-Mercado appealed convictions for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute cocaine on board a vessel subject to United States jurisdiction. The defendants argued the offense occurred within Colombia’s exclusive economic zone rather than on the high seas, that the government failed to establish the vessel was without nationality, that the Netherlands’ involvement in the enforcement action deprived the court of jurisdiction, and that their due process rights were violated by the lack of reverse Miranda warnings and the absence of a nexus to the United States.

The court’s reasoning

The court first addressed the constitutional challenge, adhering to its prior decision in United States v. Alfonso to hold that the high seas include exclusive economic zones, meaning the Felonies Clause supports enforcement of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act in those waters. Regarding statutory jurisdiction, the court found no clear error in the district court’s determination that the vessel was stateless because the master, Julio Javier Liriano-Mercado, identified himself but remained silent when asked to claim nationality. The court rejected the argument that Dutch involvement in the enforcement action defeated jurisdiction, noting that United States Coast Guard officers assumed tactical control and that such cooperation is commonplace. Finally, the court dismissed due process claims, citing United States v. Gruezo to reject the void for vagueness argument, ruling that the reverse Miranda warning requirement is waived by guilty pleas, and relying on precedent to confirm that the statute does not require a nexus to the United States.

What it means going forward

The ruling reinforces the Eleventh Circuit’s precedent that the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act applies to drug trafficking within foreign exclusive economic zones and that a failure to claim nationality renders a vessel subject to United States jurisdiction, even when foreign allies assist in the boarding.