5th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Apr 8 2026
25-40457 Per Curiam

Pete v. Equifax, Inc.

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's lawsuit after he failed to pay the required filing fee. The court held that the plaintiff waived his right to challenge the dismissal on appeal by failing to raise the issue in his brief.

Apr 8 2026
25-10996 Per Curiam

United States v. Ruiz

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted a motion by the Federal Public Defender to withdraw from representing the defendant. The court dismissed the appeal after finding no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review.

Apr 7 2026
26-40101 Per Curiam

Olali v. Johnson

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's Section 1983 challenge to a Texas discovery statute, holding that the Younger abstention doctrine bars federal intervention. The court ruled that the plaintiff had an adequate opportunity to raise his constitutional claims within the ongoing state criminal proceedings.

Apr 7 2026
25-20511 Per Curiam

Linicomn v. Harris County Sheriff's Office

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's Section 1983 claims, ruling that the proposed amended complaint failed to state a valid claim regardless of the district court's procedural error. The court held that the amendment was insufficient as a matter of law because it omitted the police department and failed to allege a Monell violation.

Apr 7 2026
25-10890 Per Curiam

McCutchan v. Nicholson

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a constitutional challenge to a Texas statute limiting marriage solemnization to religious officials or judges. The court held that the plaintiff lacked Article III standing because he failed to allege concrete plans to perform a wedding ceremony in the county.

Apr 7 2026
25-10739 Per Curiam

United States v. Lamberson

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the revocation of Kelley Lynn Lamberson's supervised release, finding no plain error in the district court's sentencing despite her claim that the court improperly relied on retributive factors. The court held that because the revocation was mandatory under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g), the district court was not required to consider the retributive factors Lamberson cited, even if she had preserved the objection.