5th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Jul 8 2026
25-10769 Per Curiam

Sanders v. Gibson

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a Texas prisoner because it was filed months after the deadline expired. The court held that the appellant could not extend the appeal period by filing successive post-judgment motions on the same grounds.

Jul 8 2026
25-30481 Per Curiam

Nicole Ester-Capers, Administratrix of the Succession of Timothy Darnell Capers v. Walmart Inc.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that an employee with a stroke and diabetes was not disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court held that the plaintiff failed to provide evidence that his conditions substantially limited a major life activity.

Jul 8 2026
25-30565 Per Curiam

United States v. Lee

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a conviction for possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking offense. The court held that the district court did not clearly err in crediting police testimony regarding the traffic stop that led to the discovery of the firearm.

Jul 7 2026
24-40779 Panel Decision

United States of America v. Theiler

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the convictions of four former Boston Heart Diagnostics executives for conspiring to violate the Anti-Kickback Statute. The court held that sufficient evidence supported the jury's finding that the defendants knowingly participated in a scheme to pay physicians for patient referrals through sham management service organizations.

Jul 7 2026
25-30076 Per Curiam

Murray v. LeBlanc

The Fifth Circuit dismissed an interlocutory appeal by Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections officials claiming qualified immunity. The court held that while it could review the legal question of authority under prior precedent, it lacked jurisdiction to resolve the factual disputes regarding the conditions of confinement.