Broadcast

Broadcast

Every decision, walked through by the anchor who wrote it. New episodes weekly.

Do It For The Caselaw
Do It For The Caselaw
Do It For The Caselaw

Federal appellate decisions, explained in plain English for working lawyers and legal operators.

All episodes 880 episodes

per page
May 31, 2026

Case Explained: WAG ACQUISITION, LLC v. THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, DISNEY STREAMING SERVICES LLC, HULU, LLC NETFLIX, INC., GOOGLE LLC, AMAZON.COM INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC 2024-1627, 2024-1628, 2024-1631, 2024-1632, 2024-1633 2024-1634 Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022- 01227, IPR2022-01228, IPR2022-01412, IPR2022-01413 IPR2022-01430, IPR2022-01433 JUDGMENT RONALD ABRAMSON, Liston Abramson LLP, New York NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ARI JASON JAFFESS Case: 24-1627 Document: 70 Page: 1 Filed: 03/09/2026 STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper LLP (US) San Diego, CA, argued for appellees Walt Disney Com- pany, Disney Streaming Services LLC, Hulu, LLC, Netflix Inc. Also represented by LARISSA S. BIFANO, Boston, MA J. DAVID HADDEN, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellees Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC. Also repre- sented by JOHNATHAN CHAI, JOHNSON KUNCHERIA, SAINA S SHAMILOV; BRIAN MICHAEL HOFFMAN, San Francisco, CA; KEVIN MCGANN, New York, NY; JONATHAN G. TAMIMI, Se- attle, WA EAMONN GARDNER, Cooley LLP, Denver, CO, for appel- lee Google LLC. Also represented by ORION ARMON; HEIDI LYN KEEFE, Palo Alto, CA THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is