Broadcast

Broadcast

Every decision, walked through by the anchor who wrote it. New episodes weekly.

Latest episode

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BABAJIDE G. ADEFUSI

Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BABAJIDE G. ADEFUSI 0:00 / --:--
Download

All episodes 1,230 episodes

per page
Jul 2, 2026

Case Explained: Wyatt Bury, LLC; Ballpark Investments, LLC, doing business as Hope & Healing Counseling; Wyatt Bury; Pamela Eisenreich State of Missouri ex rel. MO Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway v. City of Kansas City, Missouri; Jackson County, Missouri —————————— The Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity; International Foundation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice; Laura Haynes, Dr.; The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty; State of Missouri; State of Alabama; State of Alaska; State of Arkansas; State of Florida; State of Georgia; State of Idaho; State of Iowa; State of Kansas; State of Louisiana; State of Montana; State of Nebraska; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State of Oklahoma; State of South Carolina; State of South Dakota; State of Texas; State of West Virginia Amici

Case Explained: Wyatt Bury, LLC; Ballpark Investments, LLC, doing business as Hope & Healing Counseling; Wyatt Bury; Pamela Eisenreich State of Missouri ex rel. MO Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway v. City of Kansas City, Missouri; Jackson County, Missouri —————————— The Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity; International Foundation for Therapeutic and Counselling Choice; Laura Haynes, Dr.; The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty; State of Missouri; State of Alabama; State of Alaska; State of Arkansas; State of Florida; State of Georgia; State of Idaho; State of Iowa; State of Kansas; State of Louisiana; State of Montana; State of Nebraska; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State of Oklahoma; State of South Carolina; State of South Dakota; State of Texas; State of West Virginia Amici 0:00 / --:--
Download
Jul 2, 2026

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar IVETTE T. ECHENIQUE v. HAMILTON HOSPITAL HR, N.P., Testins, Records, Adm RIVERWOODS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL All employees, H.R. insurances, physicians, testins therapists, drivers, nurses, screening records adm P.A., N.P HIGHLAND RIVERS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL AARP INSURANCE HAMILTON HOSPITAL – AMBULANCE N.P., et al USCA11 Case: 25-14222 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 07/02/2026 Page: 1 of 8 2

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar IVETTE T. ECHENIQUE v. HAMILTON HOSPITAL HR, N.P., Testins, Records, Adm RIVERWOODS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL All employees, H.R. insurances, physicians, testins therapists, drivers, nurses, screening records adm P.A., N.P HIGHLAND RIVERS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL AARP INSURANCE HAMILTON HOSPITAL – AMBULANCE N.P., et al USCA11 Case: 25-14222 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 07/02/2026 Page: 1 of 8 2 0:00 / --:--
Download
Jul 2, 2026

Case Explained: NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR STATE AND LOCAL HISTORY; ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL PARK RANGERS; COALITION TO PROTECT AMERICA’S NATIONAL PARKS; SOCIETY FOR EXPERIENTIAL GRAPHIC DESIGN; UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; DOUG BURGUM, in the official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; JESSICA BOWRON, in the official capacity as the Official Exercising the Delegated Authority of the Director Before Barron, Chief Judge Gelpí and Rikelman, Circuit Judges

Case Explained: NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION; AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR STATE AND LOCAL HISTORY; ASSOCIATION OF NATIONAL PARK RANGERS; COALITION TO PROTECT AMERICA’S NATIONAL PARKS; SOCIETY FOR EXPERIENTIAL GRAPHIC DESIGN; UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; DOUG BURGUM, in the official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; NATIONAL PARK SERVICE; JESSICA BOWRON, in the official capacity as the Official Exercising the Delegated Authority of the Director Before Barron, Chief Judge Gelpí and Rikelman, Circuit Judges 0:00 / --:--
Download
Jul 2, 2026

Case Explained: ST. DOMINIC ACADEMY, d/b/a Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland, a corporation sole; ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF PORTLAND, a corporation sole; KEITH RADONIS, on their own behalf and as next friend of children K.Q.R., L.R.R., and L.T.R.; VALORI RADONIS on their own behalf and as next friend of children K.Q.R. L.R.R., and L.T.R v. A. PENDER MAKIN, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education; JEFFERSON ASHBY, in the personal capacity; MEGAN SANDERS,* in the official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; EDWARD DAVID, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; JULIE ANN O’BRIEN, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; MARK WALKER in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; THOMAS L. DOUGLAS, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission * Plaintiffs originally named Jefferson Ashby as a defendant in both his personal capacity and his official capacity as a Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission. Sometime around February 2024, Megan Sanders replaced Jefferson Ashby on the Maine Human Rights Commission. Commissioners, Me. Hum. Rts. Comm’n https://www.maine.gov/mhrc/about/commissioners [https://perma.cc/AQ4H-47JF] (last visited Apr. 28, 2026). As to the claims against Ashby

Case Explained: ST. DOMINIC ACADEMY, d/b/a Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland, a corporation sole; ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF PORTLAND, a corporation sole; KEITH RADONIS, on their own behalf and as next friend of children K.Q.R., L.R.R., and L.T.R.; VALORI RADONIS on their own behalf and as next friend of children K.Q.R. L.R.R., and L.T.R v. A. PENDER MAKIN, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education; JEFFERSON ASHBY, in the personal capacity; MEGAN SANDERS,* in the official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; EDWARD DAVID, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; JULIE ANN O’BRIEN, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; MARK WALKER in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission; THOMAS L. DOUGLAS, in the personal capacity and official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission * Plaintiffs originally named Jefferson Ashby as a defendant in both his personal capacity and his official capacity as a Commissioner of the Maine Human Rights Commission. Sometime around February 2024, Megan Sanders replaced Jefferson Ashby on the Maine Human Rights Commission. Commissioners, Me. Hum. Rts. Comm’n https://www.maine.gov/mhrc/about/commissioners [https://perma.cc/AQ4H-47JF] (last visited Apr. 28, 2026). As to the claims against Ashby 0:00 / --:--
Download