Aisha Johnson

Correspondent

Aisha Johnson

Federal courthouse correspondent, covers civil rights, employment discrimination, housing rights, and Second Amendment disputes.

Civil Rights & Constitutional

Decisions covered by Aisha Johnson

1,080 decisions
Mar 17 2026
10th Cir. 4:24-CV-00489-SEH-MTS Panel Decision

ERIC FERNANDEZ v. DAVID ROGERS, Interim Warden

The Tenth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Eric Fernandez's federal habeas petition because it was filed after the one-year statute of limitations expired. The court held that Fernandez failed to exercise due diligence in discovering that his counsel had not filed a necessary motion to withdraw his plea, which triggered the finality of his conviction.

Mar 17 2026
4th Cir. 25-1458 Per Curiam

GRACIE G. WICHTENDAHL SUAREZ v. CODY RHODES, in his capacity as Sheriff of Washington County; WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; MARYLAND STATE POLICE; STATE OF MARYLAND

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se civil rights lawsuit brought against Maryland state officials and entities. The court upheld the lower court's ruling based on sovereign immunity, failure to state a claim, and the plaintiff's refusal to amend her complaint to sue the Sheriff in his individual capacity.

Mar 17 2026
10th Cir. 2:23-CV-00402-TC Panel Decision

Zachary Rusk v. Monte Kartchner; Sim Gill; Clifford Ross, III; Bryon Stewart; Jonthan Schouman; Sam Hessi; FNU Blanche; Salt Lake County Jail

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a pro se prisoner's motion to reopen a dismissed civil rights lawsuit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). The appellate court found no abuse of discretion where the plaintiff repeatedly failed to amend a deficient complaint or respond to court orders over a period of nearly ten months.

Mar 17 2026
4th Cir. 25-6496 Per Curiam

PHILLIP C. REEVES v. SCOTTY BODIFORD; DEHLEM COMPAGNA; KIMBERLY OLSZEWSKI; RICHARD GILLESPIE; OFFICER KIRKENDOLL; D. VALEZ; WILLIAMS ANDERSON; SERGEANT CROUCH

The Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal because the district court's order to file a second amended complaint was not a final, appealable order. The appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case under federal statutes governing final judgments and interlocutory orders.

Mar 17 2026
10th Cir. 4:23-CV-00255-CVE-CDL Panel Decision

HUA JIANG v. CITY OF TULSA

The Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the City of Tulsa, ruling that a plaintiff failed to prove that the city's stated reason for hiring a less qualified candidate was pretext for age and race discrimination. The court held that procedural irregularities in the hiring process and the city's subsequent policy changes did not demonstrate discriminatory animus where the employer honestly believed the candidate possessed superior leadership experience.