5th Cir.

Gallo-Talavera v. Bondi

May 4, 2026 ·25-60478 ·Per Curiam · By Raj Patel

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing an asylum claim. The court found no error in the lower tribunal's consideration of the petitioner's age or due process arguments.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / --:--

Background

Jhonathan Steve Gallo-Talavera, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, sought asylum and withholding of removal. An Immigration Judge denied his application and ordered him removed. The Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed his appeal from that order.

The court’s reasoning

The court reviewed factual findings for substantial evidence and legal determinations de novo. It found the BIA acknowledged the petitioner’s age and gave it due consideration. The court noted that the BIA’s refusal to adopt the Immigration Judge’s conclusion on corroboration meant that conclusion was not before the appellate court. Regarding due process, the court found the Immigration Judge fulfilled her duty to develop the record based on the hearing transcript. The petitioner also failed to explain how the proceeding’s outcome would have been different but for the alleged error.

What it means going forward

The denial of the petition for review leaves the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order in place, resulting in the petitioner’s removal.

Play