4th Cir.

Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. Erin Burnett

April 27, 2026 ·25-2375 ·Per Curiam · By Maria Santos

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a pro se litigant before the district court entered a final order. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction because the appeal was premature and did not concern a final or appealable interlocutory order.

Background

Ronald Satish Emrit, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal in a civil case after a magistrate judge issued a report recommending dismissal of his complaint as frivolous. However, the district court had not yet entered any formal orders at the time the appeal was filed.

The court’s reasoning

The court explained that its jurisdiction is limited to final orders under Section twelve hundred and ninety-one of Title twenty-eight of the United States Code, as well as certain interlocutory and collateral orders under Section twelve hundred and ninety-two of Title twenty-eight of the United States Code and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure fifty-four, subsection (b). The court cited Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corporation to reinforce the finality requirement. Since the appellant did not seek to appeal a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, the court found it lacked jurisdiction.

What it means going forward

The dismissal prevents the appellate court from reviewing the merits of the underlying civil dispute until a final order is entered by the district court.