May 7 2026
9th Cir. 1:24-cv-00494-JLT-SAB Unpublished

Martinez v. United States

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's claims against the United States government. The court held that the plaintiff failed to name proper defendants for his Bivens claim and that sovereign immunity barred his Federal Tort Claims Act claim.

Apr 29 2026
9th Cir. 3:24-cv-02398-LB Unpublished

REZANEZHAD GATABI V. TARGET CORPORATION, ET AL.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a personal injury lawsuit against Target, ruling that California's two-year statute of limitations applies to the case rather than North Dakota's six-year period. The court held that under California's governmental interest approach to choice of law, the state has a stronger interest in applying its laws to a California resident suing in a California court for products purchased there.

Apr 28 2026
1st Cir. 25-1857 Panel Decision

ELIZABETH PUTNAM; CALE PUTNAM v. EPR PROPERTIES; PREMIER PARKS, LLC

The First Circuit reversed the dismissal of a wrongful death claim against Premier Parks, LLC, finding that public statements and operational intermingling created a genuine dispute regarding personal jurisdiction. Conversely, the court affirmed the dismissal against EPR Properties, ruling that the plaintiffs failed to provide evidence linking the real estate trust to the hotel's marketing or booking activities in Massachusetts.

Apr 24 2026
9th Cir. 3:24-cv-00429-CAB-DEB Unpublished

Fitzhugh v. United States

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Jeffery Lee Fitzhugh's Federal Tort Claims Act lawsuit, ruling that his administrative claim was filed more than two years after the incident and lacked the necessary facts for equitable tolling. The court also upheld the district court's denial of leave to file a second amended complaint because Fitzhugh failed to cure identified deficiencies despite prior opportunities.

Apr 23 2026
11th Cir. 1:24-cv-05222-LMM Per Curiam

Brown v. E.T. Browne Drug Company

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a products liability lawsuit filed by a pro se plaintiff, ruling that his claims were time-barred under Georgia's statute of limitations and statute of repose. The court held that the plaintiff failed to plausibly allege that his injury was undiscovered within the statutory period, as his medical records and concessions established he knew of the harm in 2021.