Apr 21 2026
10th Cir. 4:24-CR-00081-JDR-1) Panel Decision

United States v. King

The Tenth Circuit affirmed Adam Joseph King's conviction for sexual offenses in Indian Country, ruling that the evidence was sufficient to prove the victim's Indian status and the defendant's non-Indian status. The court further held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by allowing alternate charges under two different federal statutes, provided the jury was instructed to convict on only one theory.

Apr 20 2026
11th Cir. 8:22-cr-00438-SDM-CPT-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Thompson

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a defendant who challenged his sentence as substantively unreasonable. The court held that the defendant's plea agreement contained a valid appeal waiver that barred the challenge.

Apr 20 2026
11th Cir. 8:22-cr-00438-SDM-CPT-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Thompson

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a defendant who had signed a plea agreement containing a sentence appeal waiver. The court held that the waiver was entered knowingly and voluntarily, barring the defendant from challenging his sentence despite his constitutional arguments.

Apr 20 2026
11th Cir. 8:22-cr-00438-SDM-CPT-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Thompson

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal by a defendant who challenged his sentence as substantively unreasonable. The court held that the defendant's plea agreement contained a valid appeal waiver that barred the challenge.

Apr 20 2026
11th Cir. 8:22-cr-00438-SDM-CPT-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Thompson

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a defendant who challenged his sentence as substantively unreasonable. The court held that the defendant's plea agreement contained a valid appeal waiver that barred the challenge.

Apr 20 2026
10th Cir. 25-7046 Panel Decision

United States v. Mandrell

The Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court's revocation of supervised release after a defendant violated a halfway house policy by possessing sexually explicit material on his phone. The appellate court held that the probation officer's testimony provided sufficient evidence to support the finding of a violation by a preponderance of the evidence.