Apr 30 2026
9th Cir. 2:24-cr-00045-TOR-1 Unpublished

USA V. KLOEPFEL

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a 96-month sentence for a felon in possession of a firearm, rejecting claims that the district court committed procedural errors by departing from sentencing guidelines. The court held that judges are not required to incrementally move through criminal history categories and that such factors are properly considered within the ultimate reasonableness analysis.

Apr 30 2026
8th Cir. 25-1645 Panel Decision

United States of America v. Christopher William Weigert

The Eighth Circuit affirmed the revocation of supervised release and a 12-month sentence, ruling that the district court did not clearly err in finding drug use and new law violations based on witness testimony. The court further held that the sentence was substantively reasonable given the defendant's refusal to take responsibility for his actions.

Apr 29 2026
11th Cir. 1:09-cr-00029-JB-B-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Laphonse Young

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the revocation of Laphonse Young's supervised release, holding that the district court retained jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i) because a warrant was issued before the term expired. The court rejected Young's arguments regarding hearsay evidence and the opportunity to object, finding no reversible error in the district court's proceedings.

Apr 29 2026
4th Cir. 24-4331 Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSEPH BOURABAH

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the denial of Joseph Bourabah's motions to substitute counsel and withdraw his guilty plea, finding no abuse of discretion in the district court's handling of the requests. The court upheld a 100-month sentence for a severe cyberstalking campaign, ruling that the district court properly applied upward departures for the extreme psychological injury inflicted on the victims.

Apr 28 2026
10th Cir. 5:25-CV-03006-JWL Panel Decision

Harris v. Warden

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the denial of a federal prisoner's habeas petition challenging the Bureau of Prisons' calculation of First Step Act time credits. The court held that the petitioner failed to meet his burden of proving he actually earned credits through successful participation in qualifying programming during his pre-designation custody period.