Jun 18 2026
5th Cir. 24-30307 Panel Decision

United States of America v. Comeaux

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the conviction of a defendant charged with possessing an unregistered silencer. The court held that while silencers are protected arms under the Second Amendment, the defendant failed to show the National Firearms Act was applied abusively.

Jun 17 2026
11th Cir. 1:18-cr-20326-DSL-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Lau

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court's imposition of a special condition prohibiting a defendant convicted of child pornography offenses from having contact with animals inside her home. The court held that the condition was reasonably related to the defendant's offense conduct and did not constitute an abuse of discretion.

Jun 17 2026
4th Cir. 25-4217 Per Curiam

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MICHAEL WINDOM

The Fourth Circuit affirmed in part and dismissed in part the sentence imposed on Michael Windom for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court held that Windom's appeal waiver barred his challenge to the procedural reasonableness of his sentence, while finding no material discrepancy between his oral and written supervised release conditions.

Jun 17 2026
5th Cir. 26-10016 Per Curiam

United States v. Rubell

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the revocation of Andre Demarcus Rubell's supervised release and his subsequent sentence. The court held that Rubell's constitutional challenge to the statute was foreclosed by binding precedent.

Jun 17 2026
4th Cir. 26-4035 Per Curiam

United States v. Cody Zane Stevenson

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a nine-month prison sentence. The court found no reversible error in the revocation proceedings or the reasonableness of the sentence despite the appellant's arguments regarding procedural and substantive grounds.

Jun 17 2026
9th Cir. 2:21-cr-00040-KJM-1 Unpublished

USA v. Kurashev

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a conviction for attempting to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization. The court held that the district court properly applied a terrorism sentencing enhancement based on the defendant's specific intent to support armed conflict.