Topic
Every decision we've filed under Summary Judgment.
The Fifth Circuit reversed the denial of summary judgment, holding that a deputy's brief push and pull of a mother at a school constituted de minimis force insufficient to violate the Fourth Amendment. Because the force used was nominal, the deputy is entitled to qualified immunity and the plaintiffs' federal and state law claims must be dismissed.
The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a wage-and-hour judgment against Jack in the Box, holding that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on the willfulness of Workers' Benefit Fund overdeductions. The panel also ruled that the employer must pay for the full duration of shortened meal breaks under Oregon law and remanded the shoe deduction claims for a jury to determine if the deductions ultimately benefited employees.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for defendants regarding the Towner and Stone leases but vacated the ruling for the Hudson leases. The court held that the district court failed to apply West Virginia's 'first in time' rule to determine if a 1996 assignment extinguished the plaintiff's claimed interests in the Hudson properties.
The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a wage-and-hour judgment against Jack in the Box, holding that willfulness of overdeductions requires a factual trial and that employers must pay for shortened meal periods under Oregon law. The panel also ruled that shoe deductions were not automatically for the employee's benefit and remanded for class certification reconsideration on unpaid breaks and shoe claims.
The Ninth Circuit held that a petitioner's claim of derivative citizenship presents a genuine issue of material fact that cannot be resolved by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Consequently, the court transferred the case to the United States District Court for a de novo determination of the nationality claim.
The Seventh Circuit dismissed an appeal from a denial of qualified immunity because the case turned on genuine disputes over material facts. Appellate courts lack jurisdiction to resolve factual contests at the summary judgment stage, even when video evidence exists.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Freightliner but reversed for Forest River in a Florida Lemon Law dispute, holding that the district court erred by imposing an incorrect presumption standard.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Baldwin County Board of Education, holding that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence of race-based employment discrimination or retaliation.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling denying uninsured motorist coverage to plaintiffs injured in a rollover accident. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to satisfy the causation prong of the Kastner test under Colorado law.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for a title insurer, holding that the insurer properly denied coverage because the insured failed to act within a contractual deadline, causing its property rights to revert. The court ruled that the insured's deliberate inaction and subsequent sale of the property with known title defects fell squarely within a policy exclusion.