Topic
Every decision we've filed under Sentencing Guidelines.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a 420-month prison sentence for Dustin Newsome, rejecting his challenge to the application of multiple sentencing enhancements for child pornography offenses. The court held that the district court properly calculated the Guidelines range and that the sentence was substantively reasonable given the severity of the crimes.
The Tenth Circuit enforced an appeal waiver in a plea agreement, dismissing the defendant's appeal as frivolous after a thorough review. The court granted the government's motion to enforce the waiver and allowed appointed counsel to withdraw.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to impose consecutive sentences for drug distribution, money laundering, and a supervised release violation. The court held that the district court did not plainly err in considering the seriousness of the violation conduct or in explaining its rationale for running the terms consecutively.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment, rejecting Demetrius Catching's appeal regarding his sentences for new federal drug distribution and money laundering offenses committed while on supervised release. The court found no error in the imposition of consecutive within-Guidelines sentences totaling 93 months for the new crimes and 55 months for the supervised release violation.
The Tenth Circuit enforced a defendant's appeal waiver because her 188-month sentence fell within the agreed-upon advisory guidelines range. The court concluded that opposing the government's motion to enforce the waiver would be frivolous under Anders v. California.
The Third Circuit affirmed Deon Blair's criminal sentence, rejecting his pro se arguments regarding ineffective assistance of counsel, jury trial waiver, and sufficiency of evidence. The court held that Blair knowingly waived his constitutional rights and that the evidence sufficiently supported his conviction for fentanyl distribution resulting in death.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed Nelly Idowu's conviction and sentence, rejecting her claim that the district court misapplied sentencing guidelines for money laundering. The court held that because Idowu failed to object to the guideline calculation at sentencing, she could only succeed by showing plain error, which she could not establish.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to revoke supervised release and impose a prison sentence. The appellate court found no abuse of discretion in the sentencing determination.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a 37-month prison sentence for drug possession with intent to distribute, rejecting the defendant's claim that the district court improperly prioritized Sentencing Guidelines over statutory factors. The court held that the district judge conducted a thorough review of the defendant's history and the nature of the offense, finding no abuse of discretion.
The Sixth Circuit reversed a defendant's Tier II sex offender classification under SORNA, holding that her underlying Florida conviction did not meet the federal mens rea requirements for heightened tier status. The court also vacated a twenty-year supervised release sentence, finding the district court procedurally erred by miscalculating the applicable sentencing guidelines.