Topic
Every decision we've filed under Sentencing Guidelines.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed a thirty-month prison sentence for escaping federal custody and a consecutive fifty-month sentence for a supervised release revocation. The court found no abuse of discretion in the district court's sentencing decision and granted counsel's motion to withdraw under Anders v. California.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a carjacking sentence where the defendant claimed entitlement to a sentencing reduction for acceptance of responsibility. The court held that the district court did not clearly err in denying the reduction because the defendant minimized his culpability and made inconsistent statements about the shooting.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed Nikonda Taye Ingram's conviction and sentence after finding his plea agreement waiver of appeal rights was valid and knowing. The court dismissed the appeal on issues covered by the waiver and found no meritorious grounds for appeal outside that scope following an Anders review.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment revoking Cecil Edward Jackson's supervised release and imposing a time-served sentence followed by one year of supervision. The court held that the revocation was supported by Jackson's voluntary admission and the sentence was procedurally and substantively reasonable under applicable law.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed Mitchell McNeil's 300-month sentence, ruling that the government did not breach its plea agreement by seeking a dangerous weapon enhancement. The court held that contract law principles limit the government to only those promises explicitly made in the agreement, and the agreement here reserved the right to present evidence on sentencing factors not stipulated by the parties.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed Anthony Lee Daniels' Armed Career Criminal Act sentence, ruling that while the district court erred by determining predicate offenses occurred on different occasions without a jury, the mistake was harmless. The court found that Daniels would have admitted to the different occasions facts during his guilty plea had he been properly advised of his right to a jury determination.
The Eighth Circuit affirmed consecutive sentences for federal escape and supervised release revocation, finding the district court did not abuse its discretion in weighing sentencing factors. The court also granted counsel's motion to withdraw after an independent review found no non-frivolous issues for appeal.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed in part and dismissed in part the appeal of Nikonda Taye Ingram, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. The court enforced Ingram's valid appeal waiver and found no meritorious grounds for appeal under Anders v. California.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the denial of a motion for compassionate release filed by a federal prisoner serving consecutive sentences. The court held that the district court lacked authority to reduce the sentence because the defendant had already completed the term imposed by that specific court.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a defendant's sentence and restitution order despite arguments regarding acquitted conduct. The court held that the district court's sentencing decision was reasonable and the restitution issue was waived under the law of the case doctrine.