Topic
Every decision we've filed under Robbery & Extortion.
The Sixth Circuit reversed summary judgment for an officer in a Fourth Amendment excessive force case, finding a genuine dispute of material fact regarding the timing of a chokehold. The court held that whether the deadly force was applied before or after the plaintiff attempted to grab the officer's gun is a factual question for a jury to decide.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed Tayseer Yousef's conviction and 109-month sentence for interstate transportation of stolen goods and conspiracy. The court held that Yousef was accountable for the armed robberies committed by his coconspirators because the violence was within the scope of their jointly undertaken criminal activity.
The D.C. Circuit held that a timely motion for reconsideration by the Foreign Service Grievance Board renders the underlying order nonfinal, resetting the 180-day statute of limitations for judicial review. The court reversed the district court's dismissal of four counts challenging Board orders as time-barred while affirming the dismissal of a fifth count regarding the right to file further motions.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed Aaron Strong's conviction for witness tampering, ruling that evidence of routine federal-state collaboration on excessive force cases satisfied the statutory requirement for federal involvement. The court held that a defendant's false statements to a state investigator can constitute a federal crime when the underlying conduct is a common target of federal civil rights prosecutions.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed Jesse Moore's conviction for conspiracy to commit robbery and firearm offenses, rejecting his challenge to the denial of his motion to suppress. The court held that the initial police encounter was a consensual exchange and that the subsequent search of the property fell under the open fields doctrine.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed a federal sentence, holding that Louisiana's armed robbery statute qualifies as a crime of violence under the Sentencing Guidelines. The court rejected the argument that the state law allows for reckless conduct, finding that the statutory elements inherently require the intentional use of force.
The Federal Circuit affirmed the Court of Federal Claims' jurisdiction to hear Ligado Networks' takings claim but vacated rulings on whether the company holds a protected property right in its radio spectrum license. The court remanded the case because the parties presented arguments at too high a level of generality, requiring a more specific analysis of the Communications Act and FCC actions.
The Eleventh Circuit granted a petition for rehearing to vacate a prior ruling on the retroactive application of the First Step Act. The court now remands the case for resentencing in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Hewitt v. United States.
The Tenth Circuit held that the Governor of Colorado is not immune from suit regarding alleged violations of a prisoner's religious rights because state law grants him final authority over the Department of Corrections. The court further ruled that the prisoner's transfer to a new facility did not moot his claims for injunctive relief since the alleged unconstitutional conditions persist.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed convictions for Hobbs Act robbery, holding that federal courts have jurisdiction over generally applicable federal crimes committed by Indians against Indians in Indian country. The court also ruled that while the district court erred by failing to perform an on-the-record balancing test before admitting prior conviction evidence, the error was harmless given the strength of the remaining evidence.