Topic
Every decision we've filed under Intellectual Property.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in this inter partes review matter. The court issued a nonprecedential per curiam judgment without providing detailed reasoning.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in an inter partes review proceeding. The court issued a per curiam judgment without providing a written opinion explaining the reasoning.
The Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's determination that Universal Electronics' patent claims were unpatentable as obvious. The court found substantial evidence that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine four prior art references to achieve the claimed method of adjusting appliance volume based on noise thresholds.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in an intellectual property dispute. The court issued a per curiam order without providing detailed written reasoning.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in an inter partes review proceeding. The court issued a nonprecedential per curiam judgment without providing detailed reasoning.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. This nonprecedential order resolves an appeal regarding patent validity proceedings without issuing a written opinion.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a district court judgment holding defendants liable for copyright infringement of Arabic-language programming. The court rejected challenges to DISH's ownership chain and upheld the finding that defendants directly infringed by using encoders to transmit protected works to U.S. customers.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision dismissing a likelihood of confusion claim. The court held that the dissimilarity between Fuente's letter X marks and Vaporous's stick figure design mark was dispositive, outweighing other factors favoring confusion.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has issued an opinion in this intellectual property dispute. Judgment has been entered in accordance with the court's decision.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a default judgment on trademark infringement claims, finding no clear error in the lower court's analysis of likelihood of confusion. The appellate panel upheld the dismissal of the plaintiff's claims, ruling that the marks were not sufficiently similar and the businesses were geographically isolated.