Mar 16 2026
10th Cir. 4:24-CR-00278-GKF-1) Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JACKEY WAYNE NUNAMAKER

The Tenth Circuit affirmed Jackey Wayne Nunamaker's conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, rejecting his Second Amendment challenge to the statute. The panel held that its prior decision in Vincent v. Bondi controls and precludes such challenges, even for non-violent felony offenders.

Mar 16 2026
5th Cir. 25-10990 Per Curiam

United States v. Leonard

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Desmonte Dwayne Leonard for possession of a firearm after a felony conviction. The court granted the government's motion for summary affirmance, ruling that Leonard's Second Amendment challenge is foreclosed by existing precedent.

Mar 12 2026
6th Cir. 25-3753 Published

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WYDELL S. DIXON

The Sixth Circuit affirmed a 100-month sentence for a felon in possession of a firearm, ruling that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a sentence reduction. Although the defendant became eligible for a lower sentencing range under a retroactive Guidelines amendment, the court found his extensive criminal history warranted maintaining the original term.

Mar 11 2026
10th Cir. 5:23-CR-00051-R-1) Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AKIN ZHON WOFFORD

The Tenth Circuit affirmed Akin Zhon Wofford's conviction for armed bank robbery and firearm possession, rejecting his claim that jury instructions improperly relieved the government of its burden of proof. The court held that the challenged instruction, when read in the context of all jury directions, did not mislead the jury or violate the defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights.

Mar 11 2026
10th Cir. 5:24-CR-00250-PRW-1 Panel Decision

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MALYK JAJUAN RANSBURG

The Tenth Circuit dismissed Malyk Jajuan Ransburg's appeal because he signed a valid plea agreement containing an enforceable waiver of his right to appeal. The court held that the government did not breach the plea agreement by failing to support a downward sentencing adjustment, as Ransburg's false denial of relevant conduct precluded him from receiving that benefit.