Apr 13 2026
5th Cir. 25-30377 Per Curiam

United States v. Rodgers

The Fifth Circuit affirmed Demario Montrell Rodgers's conviction for felon in possession of a firearm, ruling that the district court correctly denied his motion to suppress evidence. The court held that the totality of the circumstances provided reasonable suspicion for the investigatory stop that led to the discovery of the weapon.

Apr 13 2026
5th Cir. 25-30148 Per Curiam

United States v. Watts

The Fifth Circuit affirmed Xavion Watts's conviction and ten-year sentence for possession of a machinegun, finding no procedural or substantive error in the district court's sentencing decision. The court also rejected Watts's unpreserved constitutional challenges to the federal machinegun ban under the Second Amendment and Commerce Clause.

Apr 10 2026
5th Cir. 25-50590 Per Curiam

United States v. Vecera

The Fifth Circuit affirmed Dante Delray Vecera's conviction and sentence for possessing a firearm as a felon, rejecting all constitutional challenges to the statute. The court held that Vecera's facial, as-applied, and Commerce Clause arguments were foreclosed by binding precedent.

Apr 8 2026
11th Cir. 4:24-cr-00044-MW-MAF-1 Per Curiam

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WHITFIELD LELAND, III

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a 264-month sentence for Hobbs Act robbery, holding that the defendant's 2011 Florida aggravated assault conviction properly qualified as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The court rejected the defendant's argument that a recent Supreme Court decision undermined the binding precedent establishing that Florida assault statutes require a knowing mens rea.

Apr 8 2026
11th Cir. 0:19-cr-60129-RAR-1 Unpublished

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NIGEL RICHSON

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed Nigel Richardson's convictions for Hobbs Act robbery and firearm offenses, rejecting challenges to the sufficiency of evidence and the indictment's Grand Jury Clause compliance. The court held that Hobbs Act robbery remains a crime of violence under the elements clause and that the indictment's language adequately alleged knowledge of Richardson's felon status.

Apr 8 2026
9th Cir. 2:22-cr-00597-RGK-1 Unpublished

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE MANUEL PEREZ

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a defendant's second request for substitute counsel but reversed the denial of a third request due to the district court's failure to conduct a required inquiry. The court also vacated the defendant's sentence because the district court incorrectly applied the Sentencing Guidelines regarding what constitutes a crime of violence.