Jun 2 2026
9th Cir. 2:25-cv-00054-DLC Unpublished

LIGHTHISER, ET AL. V. TRUMP, ET AL.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit challenging three executive orders on energy policy. The court held that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing because their alleged injuries were too speculative and the requested relief was beyond the power of the federal courts.

May 1 2026
5th Cir. 26-30203 Panel Decision

State of Louisiana, by & through its Attorney General, Liz Murrill; Rosalie Markezich v. Food & Drug Administration; Marty Makary; Richard Pazdur

The Fifth Circuit granted Louisiana's motion to stay the FDA's 2023 regulation allowing remote dispensing of mifepristone. The court held that the agency's admission of failing to study remote dispensing safety created irreparable harm that outweighed the public interest in maintaining the rule.

Apr 30 2026
1st Cir. 26-1209 Panel Decision

GORDON-DARBY HOLDINGS, INC v. ROBERT L. QUINN, in the official capacity as Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Safety, et al

The First Circuit granted the Commissioners' motion to stay a preliminary injunction that had blocked New Hampshire from repealing its motor vehicle emissions inspection program. The court held that the state likely succeeded on the merits because the Clean Air Act does not authorize citizen suits based on purely prospective violations of State Implementation Plans.

Apr 29 2026
5th Cir. 25-60490 Per Curiam

In the Matter of Ikechukwu H. Okorie Debtor Ikechukwu H. Okorie v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; Harris County; Alief Independent School District; West Keegans Bayou Improvement District

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the denial of a debtor's motion to void bankruptcy property sales, ruling that individual debtors lack standing under 11 U.S.C. § 363(n) to pursue claims reserved for trustees. The court further held that the debtor's attempt to reopen the sales was barred by res judicata and statutory time limits.

Apr 27 2026
9th Cir. 24-6193 Unanimous

HANAN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ET AL.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the government, holding that the statutory marriage fraud bar applies even when no immigration benefit was actually sought in the prior fraudulent marriage. The court further ruled that USCIS satisfied due process requirements by relying on an ex-spouse's testimony without cross-examination, given the presence of independent evidence and the administrative burden of such hearings.