Jun 24 2026
6th Cir. 24-6073 Published

United States v. Horton

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the drug trafficking and firearms convictions of two defendants despite challenges regarding gang-related evidence and jury instructions. The court found the evidence sufficient to prove firearm possession in furtherance of drug trafficking and deemed any trial errors harmless.

Jun 24 2026
6th Cir. 25-5006 Published

United States v. Horton

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the drug trafficking and firearms convictions of Jerlen Horton and Jacoby Summers. The court found the evidence sufficient to prove firearm possession in furtherance of drug trafficking and determined that any trial errors were harmless.

Jun 24 2026
11th Cir. 8:23-cr-00071-KKM-SPF-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Lindsey

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of a defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court held that police had probable cause to search the rental vehicle and that the sentencing enhancement for possessing a firearm in connection with another felony was properly applied.

Jun 24 2026
10th Cir. 6:24-CR-00106-RAW-1 Panel Decision

United States v. Marris

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed an appeal challenging a seventeen-year prison sentence for discharging a firearm during a violent crime. Appointed counsel filed an Anders brief asserting the appeal was wholly frivolous, and the panel agreed after reviewing the record.

Jun 24 2026
11th Cir. 1:23-cr-00085-JB-N-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Conner

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of Daniel Conner for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. The court rejected arguments regarding the withdrawal of his guilty plea, the validity of the indictment, and the application of the Armed Career Criminal Act enhancement.

Jun 24 2026
4th Cir. 25-4489 Per Curiam

United States v. Beasley

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to revoke supervised release and impose a twenty-four-month prison sentence. The appellate court held that the district court acted within its broad discretion in sentencing the defendant for repeated violations of his release conditions.