Topic
Every decision we've filed under Drug Trafficking.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed a 162-month prison sentence for a felon in possession of a firearm, rejecting arguments regarding sentencing enhancements. Because the defendant failed to preserve his objections in the district court, the appellate court reviewed the case only for plain error and found no clear mistake.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed Tyreic Brewer's convictions for being a felon in possession of a firearm, rejecting his Second Amendment challenge under binding precedent. The court also upheld the 60-month sentence, finding it reasonable given Brewer's repeated offenses and history of obstructing justice.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed Tony Wilkinson's conviction for felon in possession of a firearm, ruling that his extensive criminal history establishes he is dangerous under the Second Amendment. The court held that no remand was necessary because the record evidence indisputably showed Wilkinson posed a threat to the community.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed Octavio Jimenez-Marquez's conviction for possessing firearms in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime, finding the evidence sufficient under established factors. The court also rejected a constitutional vagueness challenge, clarifying that the 'in furtherance of' standard provides fair notice to defendants.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed the denial of a concealed-carry permit to a former soldier with a military drug conviction, holding that the Full Faith and Credit Clause does not restrict states from imposing firearm disabilities based on federal military judgments. The court further ruled that Wisconsin's prohibition on firearm possession for individuals convicted of distributing drugs is constitutional both on its face and as applied to the appellant.
The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a compassionate release motion, ruling that a defendant's extensive criminal history and the need for public safety outweighed his rehabilitation efforts. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it found the statutory sentencing factors favored maintaining the original sentence.
The Seventh Circuit reversed a district court's ruling that invalidated 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) on its face under the Second Amendment. The appellate court held that Supreme Court precedent does not categorically prohibit disarming all felons, particularly those with histories of dangerous conduct.
The Seventh Circuit affirmed Edlando Watson's conviction for possessing a firearm as a felon, holding that disarming individuals convicted of dangerous drug-dealing felonies aligns with the nation's historical tradition. The court applied the Supreme Court's two-step *Bruen* test to find the statute constitutional as applied to Watson, while explicitly declining to rule on whether non-dangerous felons may be similarly restricted.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed Christian Cole's 240-month prison sentence, rejecting his challenges to a sentencing enhancement and the reasonableness of the term. The court held that the district court properly applied the firearm enhancement and that the downward variance was justified by Cole's specific circumstances.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed Michael Williams's within-Guidelines sentence for violating his supervised release, rejecting his claim that the district court impermissibly relied on retributive factors. The court held that the district court properly considered the breach of trust and the need for deterrence when imposing consecutive sentences for the new offense and the revocation.