Apr 28 2026
8th Cir. 24-3627 Panel Decision

United States of America v. Corey Deandra Thomas

The Eighth Circuit affirmed Corey Deandra Thomas's substantive sentence, ruling that the district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing an upward variance. The appellate court found the judge properly weighed all statutory sentencing factors through an individualized assessment of the offense and the defendant's history.

Apr 28 2026
10th Cir. 24-6244 Panel Decision

United States v. Velazquez Hernandez

The Tenth Circuit affirmed a conviction for possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute, ruling that the defendant forfeited his challenge to the exclusion of video recordings. Because the defendant failed to preserve the evidentiary issue under Federal Rule of Evidence 106, the court applied a plain error standard and found no manifest injustice.

Apr 28 2026
3rd Cir. 24-2260 Panel Decision

COREY R. KENDIG v. NICHOLAS STOLAR

The Third Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Trooper Nicholas Stolar, holding that while omitting self-defense evidence from a probable cause affidavit can violate the Fourth Amendment, the right was not clearly established at the time of the arrest. Consequently, Trooper Stolar retains qualified immunity despite the court's new rule requiring officers to disclose known facts that conclusively negate the mental state of a charged crime.

Apr 28 2026
4th Cir. 24-4604 Panel Decision

United States v. Allen

The Fourth Circuit reversed a district court order suppressing evidence found in a defendant's bags during an arrest. The appellate court held that the evidence would have been inevitably discovered through standard inventory search policies at the detention center.

Apr 28 2026
5th Cir. 25-30475 Per Curiam

United States v. Vargas-Duque

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted a motion by appointed counsel to withdraw from representing the defendant. The court dismissed the appeal after finding no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review.

Apr 28 2026
6th Cir. 25-3458 Published

Crenshaw v. Warden, Lorain Correctional Institution

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Charles Crenshaw's lawsuit against federal and state prison wardens, ruling that his claims were either time-barred or failed to state a valid legal cause of action. The court held that his Federal Tort Claims Act suit was filed too late and that his constitutional claims lacked the specific factual allegations required to proceed.