Topic
Every decision we've filed under Contract.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal in a contract dispute between VB Assets, LLC and Amazon.com Services LLC. The dismissal was granted by order because the parties agreed to the resolution.
The Ninth Circuit reversed a dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, holding that non-resident defendants who sold NFTs and recorded a California resident's call purposefully directed their activities at the state. The court found the defendants' intentional acts expressly aimed at California caused foreseeable harm, satisfying the jurisdictional requirements without shifting the burden of unreasonableness.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed judgment on the pleadings for five of six claims, ruling that Fareportal's RICO, DTSA, and trade secret actions were time-barred because the company knew of the injury in 2016. The court reversed regarding the civil conspiracy and Unfair Competition Law claims, finding them timely and remanding for further proceedings on those specific causes of action.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a pro se litigant's motion for sanctions, ruling that the motion failed to satisfy the mandatory safe harbor provision and was untimely. The court also upheld the rejection of a motion for reconsideration because the appellant failed to identify errors or present new evidence.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a former employee's claims for unpaid profit-sharing, ruling that oral agreements contradicting a written contract's 'Entire Agreement' clause are unenforceable. The court held that the written contract's explicit statement of 'full compensation' barred quasi-contractual theories like promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a bankruptcy court ruling that Clearcom, Inc. breached its contractual obligations to access the Paniolo Cable Company's undersea infrastructure. The court held that Clearcom failed to meet its burden of proving that the Master Services Agreement and Emergency Service Order were no longer in effect when it issued a settlement guarantee.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of a hedge fund manager's claims for profit-sharing disputes. The court held that the plaintiff failed to plausibly state claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, or unjust enrichment due to a comprehensive written agreement.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court order denying a pro se litigant's motion for sanctions. The appellate court held that the motion failed to comply with the safe harbor provision and was untimely.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in a foreclosure dispute, ruling that non-diverse defendants were improperly joined because the plaintiff could not state viable claims against them. The court further held that the plaintiff's challenges to the bank's authority to foreclose and his due process claims were meritless under Texas law.
The Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment against a Deepwater Horizon cleanup worker who failed to submit expert reports within an extended deadline. The court held that the settlement agreement did not mandate indefinite delays and that the district court acted within its authority to manage its docket.