Oct 16 2024
9th Cir. 24-4455 Unanimous

In re: THOMAS EUGENE CREECH

The Ninth Circuit granted a writ of mandamus to recuse a district judge from a civil rights case due to her longstanding friendship with the opposing prosecutor. The court held that the judge abused her discretion by failing to recognize that a reasonable person might question her impartiality given the allegations of misconduct against her friend.

Apr 19 2024
2nd Cir. 22-2895-pr Panel Decision

JOE BALTAS v. DAVID MAIGA, In his Individual and Official Capacities, ROLLIN COOK, In his Individual and Official Capacities, ANGEL QUIROS In his Individual and Official Capacit...

The Second Circuit held that periodic reviews of a Connecticut prisoner's administrative segregation status satisfied due process even while he was incarcerated in Virginia. However, the court found a genuine dispute of material fact regarding whether Virginia Department of Corrections administrative remedies were available to the plaintiff, rendering summary judgment on his First, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment claims inappropriate.

Feb 24 2024
9th Cir. 1:24-cv-00066- Published

THOMAS EUGENE CREECH v. IDAHO COMMISSION OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and JAN M BENNETTS, Ada County Prosecuting Attorney

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a preliminary injunction, rejecting a death row inmate's due process claims regarding Idaho's commutation proceedings. The court held that the state's procedures satisfied constitutional minimums and that any alleged prosecutorial errors were harmless given the overwhelming evidence supporting the denial of clemency.

Feb 24 2024
9th Cir. 1:20-cv-00114- Per Curiam

THOMAS E. CREECH v. JOSH TEWALT, Director, Idaho Department of Correction; TIM RICHARDSON, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution; CHAD PAGE, Chief, Division of Prisons, Ida...

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of preliminary injunctive relief to death row inmate Thomas Creech regarding his scheduled lethal injection. The court held that Creech failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on his Due Process and Eighth Amendment claims because his arguments about drug provenance were speculative and he offered no viable alternative execution method.