Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a felon-in-possession sentence, holding that the Sentencing Commission's commentary defining a large capacity magazine warrants judicial deference. The court ruled that the term is ambiguous and the Commission's interpretation of over fifteen rounds is reasonable.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed Gail Manney's conviction for making false statements on a federal firearm purchase form, ruling that the Second Amendment does not protect the act of lying to a dealer. The court further held that such misrepresentations are legally material regardless of whether the actual purchaser is legally eligible to own a gun.
The D.C. Circuit held that U.S. district courts have jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act to confirm arbitration awards against Spain, even as Spain argued EU law voided the underlying arbitration agreements. However, the court reversed the lower court's decision to enjoin Spain from seeking anti-suit relief in European courts, citing the sensitive nature of imposing such orders on a foreign sovereign.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a preliminary injunction blocking California's requirement that online businesses opine on and mitigate risks of children viewing harmful content, ruling it likely violates the First Amendment by compelling speech. However, the court vacated the broader injunction covering other provisions because the record was insufficient to determine if those sections are facially unconstitutional or severable from the invalid mandate.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review and remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals because the agency mischaracterized a California statute and misapplied equitable tolling standards. The court held that the state court vacated the petitioner's conviction due to a constitutional plea defect, not solely to mitigate immigration consequences.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of Tahawwur Hussain Rana's habeas petition challenging his extradition to India. The court held that the extradition treaty's double jeopardy exception applies to charged crimes with distinct elements, not underlying acts, allowing extradition despite Rana's prior U.S. acquittal.
The D.C. Circuit held that the Fourth Amendment requires the continued retention of personal property seized incident to a lawful arrest to remain reasonable, even after the arrestee has been released. The court reversed the district court's dismissal of claims alleging that the District of Columbia unreasonably retained plaintiffs' property for months or years without justification.
The D.C. Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in a defamation case, ruling that the appellant's motion for additional discovery was untimely and that the statements were protected by common interest privilege. The court held that the appellant failed to meet the difficult burden of proving actual malice required to overcome that privilege.
The D.C. Circuit held that Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act does not completely preempt a prospective agent's state law claims against the NFLPA, thereby stripping the District Court of federal question jurisdiction. The court remanded the case with instructions to dismiss the claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction rather than for failure to state a claim.
The D.C. Circuit vacated the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's approval of a major natural gas pipeline, ruling that the agency arbitrarily overlooked significant environmental consequences and failed to adequately assess market need. The court held that FERC violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the Natural Gas Act by ignoring state mandates to reduce gas consumption and failing to properly balance the project's climate impacts.
