Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.
The Ninth Circuit held that a conviction for armed robbery under Arizona law constitutes a categorical aggravated felony theft offense under federal immigration law. Consequently, the petitioner's petition for review of his removal order was denied because his state conviction necessarily included all elements of generic federal theft.
The Second Circuit affirmed a jury verdict in a reverse redlining case where Black and Latino homeowners successfully sued a lender for violating antidiscrimination laws by targeting them with predatory mortgage refinancing loans. The court held that equitable tolling applied to the statute of limitations and that a release-of-claims provision in a loan modification agreement was unenforceable as a matter of law.
The D.C. Circuit certified a critical question of District of Columbia tort law to the D.C. Court of Appeals regarding whether a passenger who involuntarily falls from a platform ledge becomes a trespasser. Because no controlling precedent exists to determine the transit authority's duty of care in this specific scenario, the case is remanded pending the higher court's decision.
The Ninth Circuit held that the Board of Immigration Appeals abused its discretion by denying a motion to remand without addressing evidence of unavailability due to homelessness or evaluating good cause under Matter of R-C-R-. The court remanded the case for the BIA to properly consider whether the petitioner established prima facie eligibility for asylum and related relief.
The Ninth Circuit held that a Washington state harassment conviction categorically qualifies as a crime of violence, barring the petitioner from cancellation of removal and other discretionary relief. The court also affirmed the denial of Convention Against Torture relief due to insufficient evidence of a specific threat of torture upon return to Mexico.
The Second Circuit vacated the dismissal of three religious organizations' expressive-association claims against New York's reproductive health anti-discrimination law, recognizing that employers may assert associational rights when forced to retain employees who contradict their mission. The Court affirmed the dismissal of free speech and free exercise claims while remanding the case to determine if the plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the law burdens their specific organizational missions.
The Second Circuit affirmed the district courts’ preliminary injunctions against New York’s public firearm carriage laws, holding that Plaintiffs demonstrated a likelihood of success on their Second Amendment claims under the *Bruen* historical tradition test. The…
The Second Circuit affirmed the district courts’ injunctions against New York’s public firearm carriage laws, holding that the state failed to demonstrate these restrictions are consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation as required…
The Ninth Circuit denied Omar Tellez-Ramirez's petition for review, holding that his Idaho drug conviction qualifies as a removable aggravated felony. The court applied the modified categorical approach to confirm the conviction involved methamphetamine and matched federal mental state requirements.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a petition for review, holding that Miranda warnings and the exclusionary rule do not apply in civil immigration removal proceedings. The court rejected the petitioner's argument that an administrative arrest warrant transformed the civil nature of the proceeding into a criminal one.
