Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE MANUEL PEREZ
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a defendant's second request for substitute counsel but reversed the denial of a third request due to the district court's failure to conduct a required inquiry. The court also vacated the defendant's sentence because the district court incorrectly applied the Sentencing Guidelines regarding what constitutes a crime of violence.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMOTHY PEOPLES
The Ninth Circuit affirmed Timothy Peoples' cocaine trafficking conviction, ruling that any error in excluding evidence of a police officer's misconduct was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of guilt. The court further held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in instructing the jury that the evidence was legally obtained.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TREVION DARNELL MITCHELL
The Ninth Circuit affirmed a 120-month federal sentence for a defendant who possessed a handgun while kidnapping and beating a domestic partner. The court held that the government met its burden to show the firearm facilitated the underlying felonies through the defendant's threats and constructive possession.
UNITE HERE INTERNATIONAL UNION v. WILTON RANCHERIA
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of the Wilton Rancheria's motion to vacate an arbitration award requiring the Tribe to cooperate with a specific union election procedure. The court held that the arbitrator did not manifest a disregard of the law or issue a completely irrational decision by determining that the Tribal Labor Relations Ordinance procedure was not the exclusive method available under the parties' Memorandum of Agreement.
MARICELA ELIZABETH RODRIGUEZ DOMINGUEZ; KIMBERLY MICHELLE MORAN RODRIGUEZ; CHRISS ENRIQUE MORAN RODRIGUEZ v. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General
The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision rejecting asylum and related relief for an El Salvadorian family targeted by gang extortion. The court held that the harm was motivated by economic interest rather than a protected ground, failing the statutory nexus requirement for asylum.