Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Apr 27 2026
10th Cir. 24-6132 Panel Decision

Devon Energy Production Company, et al. v. DOI

The Tenth Circuit held that the Office of Natural Resources Revenue acted arbitrarily and capriciously by failing to consider a prior settlement agreement when denying Devon Energy's cost deductions for gas production. The court remanded the case to the district court with instructions to vacate the agency's order and require a new determination consistent with the settlement terms.

Apr 27 2026
5th Cir. 25-30192 Per Curiam

United States of America Plaintiff— v. Julius Augillard Defendant—

The Fifth Circuit affirmed Julius Augillard's 70-month sentence for felon in possession of a firearm, rejecting his challenges to the sentencing guidelines' application of the realistic probability test and the firearm enhancement. However, the court vacated the judgment in part because the district court failed to orally pronounce a discretionary supervised release condition that was later added to the written judgment.

Apr 27 2026
4th Cir. 25-2441 Per Curiam

In re MARTINEZ ORLANDIS BLACK

The Fourth Circuit denied a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel North Carolina state courts to enforce a prior state order. The court held that federal courts lack jurisdiction to issue mandamus relief against state officials or to review final state court orders.

Apr 27 2026
9th Cir. 24-7200 Unpublished

AGAPITO MORALES, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of asylum and Convention Against Torture claims because the petitioners failed to submit required biometrics despite sixteen months of notice. The court held that the Immigration Judge did not abuse his discretion in deeming the applications abandoned and rejected due process arguments regarding legal assistance.

Apr 27 2026
10th Cir. 1:22-CR-00092-HCN-1 Panel Decision

United States v. Rangel

The Tenth Circuit affirmed the conviction of Michael Anthony Rangel for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court held that existing precedent upholding the constitutionality of the federal statute remains binding despite recent Supreme Court guidance.