Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.
The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an ERISA class action alleging excessive recordkeeping fees, holding that plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege a breach of the duty of prudence. The court ruled that comparing fee amounts without specific factual context regarding the quality and scope of services provided is insufficient to state a claim.
The Second Circuit vacated a dismissal, holding that Connecticut lawyers have Article III standing to challenge a new bar rule restricting speech. The court found the plaintiffs plausibly alleged a credible threat of enforcement that chills their First Amendment rights.
The Second Circuit vacated a default judgment against a corrections officer, ruling that the district court abused its discretion by awarding damages while dismissing identical claims against co-defendants for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Applying the prohibition on inconsistent judgments, the court held that a plaintiff cannot prevail against a defaulting defendant when the same legal bar precludes the claims against litigating co-defendants.
The Second Circuit held that New York's ban on physically displaying ivory for sale constitutes a content-based restriction on commercial speech subject to strict scrutiny. The court found the state failed to prove the ban was narrowly tailored, as less restrictive alternatives were available to prevent illegal sales.
The Second Circuit vacated the dismissal of a breach-of-contract claim against McGraw Hill, ruling that the publisher's 'own expense' clause was ambiguous regarding digital distribution costs. While affirming the dismissal of claims related to 'net receipts' definitions, the court remanded the case to allow authors to proceed with allegations that the publisher shifted publishing expenses to them.
The Second Circuit reversed the dismissal of a Title IX claim, holding that a school district's investigation into a male educator could plausibly constitute sex discrimination. The court found the complaint sufficiently detailed to support allegations of a sham investigation and sex-based bias by the Title IX coordinator.
The Ninth Circuit dismissed Apple's appeal of a district court order granting discovery under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 because the scope of the required production remained undetermined. The panel held that without a final determination of what documents must be produced, the order was not a final judgment subject to appellate review.
The Second Circuit held that Title VI's bar on employment-related claims does not prevent an employee from suing for retaliation when the underlying complaint concerns non-employment discrimination. The court vacated the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim and remanded the case for further proceedings on the merits.
The Second Circuit dismissed an appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the appellant failed to file a motion for reconsideration within the strict deadlines set by federal rules. The court clarified that merely serving a motion on opposing parties does not toll the appeal clock, and that the relevant rule is a mandatory claim-processing rule immune from equitable tolling.
The Second Circuit dismissed the Republic of Sudan's interlocutory appeal, holding that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act's appellate bar precludes immediate review of immunity denials under the collateral-order doctrine. Sudan must await a final judgment before challenging the district court's ruling that it lacks sovereign immunity.
