Decisions

Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Jul 7 2026
6th Cir. 25-1898 Published

United States v. Moore

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress a firearm found in a vehicle. The court held that officers had probable cause to search the car under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement.

Jul 7 2026
9th Cir. 24-5264 Published

Sarr v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review challenging a Board of Immigration Appeals decision that found a drug trafficking conviction to be a particularly serious crime. The panel held that the Attorney General's strong presumption in Matter of Y-L- sufficed to establish the petitioner was a danger to the community without requiring a separate individualized dangerousness analysis.

Jul 7 2026
United States Court… 24-3013 Panel Decision

United States v. De Moya

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the bribery and fraud convictions of two men who bribed a tax official to reduce business tax liabilities. The court rejected arguments regarding insufficient evidence, jury instructions, ineffective assistance of counsel, and a trial penalty.

Jul 7 2026
United States Court… 23-7146 Panel Decision

Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLC: Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund v. M & K Employee Solutions, LLC

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded a district court judgment involving multiemployer pension withdrawal liability. The court addressed whether separate corporate entities should be treated as a single employer and clarified the rules for allocating partial payments and applying interest rate amendments.

Jul 7 2026
9th Cir. 25-4178 Unpublished

Singh, Et Al. v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying a motion to reopen immigration proceedings. The court held that the Board erred by classifying threats against the petitioners' family as personal circumstances rather than changed country conditions.