Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.
The Ninth Circuit reversed the Board of Immigration Appeals, holding that an immigration judge violated due process by rigidly enforcing a filing deadline without allowing a window filing. The court found the proceedings fundamentally unfair because the deadline was ambiguous and the judge refused to accept the application while still on the bench.
The Second Circuit affirmed a district court judgment holding that Conagen was not liable for breach of contract after negotiations for an exclusivity arrangement failed. The court ruled that the executed Term Sheet created a binding duty to negotiate in good faith but did not bind the parties to the specific exclusivity terms sought by Givaudan.
The Second Circuit held that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires a whistleblower to prove an employer acted with retaliatory intent to discriminate against them. Because the district court failed to instruct the jury on this essential element, the verdict is vacated and the case is remanded for a new trial.
The Second Circuit held that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires a whistleblower to prove an employer acted with specific retaliatory intent to establish an adverse employment action claim. Because the district court failed to instruct the jury on this essential element, the court vacated the verdict and remanded for a new trial.
The Second Circuit affirmed the convictions of Joseph Percoco and Steven Aiello for honest-services wire fraud, ruling that while a jury instruction regarding 'as opportunities arise' was technically flawed, the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of specific quid pro quos. The court further reaffirmed that non-officials who dominate and control government business owe a fiduciary duty to the public, rejecting arguments that Percoco's status as an unaffiliated advisor shielded him from liability.
The Second Circuit affirmed the honest-services fraud convictions of Joseph Percoco and Steven Aiello, ruling that while a jury instruction regarding 'as opportunities arise' was technically flawed, the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence. The court further reaffirmed that non-employees can owe a fiduciary duty to the public if they dominate and control government business, rejecting the argument that Percoco's status as an unofficial advisor exempted him from liability.
The Second Circuit affirmed the convictions of Joseph Percoco and Steven Aiello for honest-services wire fraud, ruling that while a jury instruction regarding 'as opportunities arise' was legally flawed, the error was harmless. The court further reaffirmed that non-employees may owe fiduciary duties to the public if they dominate governmental business and are relied upon by officials.
The Second Circuit affirmed the convictions of Joseph Percoco and Steven Aiello for honest-services wire fraud, ruling that while a jury instruction regarding 'as opportunities arise' was technically flawed, the error was harmless. The court further reaffirmed that non-employees can owe a fiduciary duty to the public if they dominate and control government business, rejecting arguments that Percoco's lack of formal employment shielded him from liability.
The Second Circuit affirmed the convictions of Joseph Percoco and Steven Aiello for honest-services wire fraud and solicitation of gratuities. The court held that while a jury instruction regarding 'as opportunities arise' was legally imprecise, the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of specific quid pro quos.
The Second Circuit affirmed the convictions of Joseph Percoco and Steven Aiello for honest-services wire fraud and bribery, ruling that while a jury instruction regarding 'as opportunities arise' was legally imprecise, the error was harmless. The court further reaffirmed that non-employees can owe fiduciary duties to the public if they dominate governmental business and are relied upon by officials.
