Decisions

Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 2:21-cr-00273-GMN-MDC-1 Unpublished

United States v. Jones

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's order revoking Mario Jones's term of supervised release. The panel found no abuse of discretion given the evidence of multiple violations, including drug offenses and a threat against a probation officer.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 5:25-cv-00860-DOC-DTB Unpublished

AMEZCUA V. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court order remanding a civil case to state court due to an insufficient amount in controversy. The appellate court held that the district court erred by excluding civil penalties and attorneys' fees from the jurisdictional threshold calculation without providing the defendant a fair opportunity to prove the amount.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 26-1043 Unpublished

Ruiz-Acosta v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review and remanded an immigration case where the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed an Immigration Judge's decision. The court found the Immigration Judge abused its discretion by pretermitting applications for asylum and related relief without providing adequate notice of biometrics obligations.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 25-3456 Unpublished

Ruiz-Acosta, Et Al. v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review and remanded the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The court found that the Immigration Judge abused its discretion by pretermitting asylum applications without providing adequate notice regarding biometrics obligations.

Jul 10 2026
Fed. Cir. 25-1107 Panel Decision

Limon v. Collins

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal from the Veterans Court due to lack of jurisdiction. The court held that the Veterans Court's remand order was not final and did not satisfy the conditions for immediate review.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 25-3016 Unpublished

Navaperez v. Nissan North America, Inc.

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court order remanding a case to state court due to an incorrect calculation of the amount in controversy. The appellate court held that the district court erred by excluding civil penalties and attorneys' fees from the jurisdictional threshold without providing the defendant a fair opportunity to prove the amount.