Decisions

Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 25-3016 Unpublished

Navaperez v. Nissan North America, Inc.

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court order remanding a case to state court due to an incorrect calculation of the amount in controversy. The appellate court held that the district court erred by excluding civil penalties and attorneys' fees from the jurisdictional threshold without providing the defendant a fair opportunity to prove the amount.

Jul 10 2026
7th Cir. 25-1890 Panel Decision

William Clements v. Gunnar Optiks, LLC

The Seventh Circuit vacated a dismissal of a biometric privacy lawsuit against a glasses manufacturer. The court held that the district court erred in accepting the defendant's medical claims as undisputed facts at the pleading stage.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 2:23-cv-01954-AN Unpublished

Taylor v. Bisignano

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court decision upholding an Administrative Law Judge's denial of supplemental security income benefits. The panel held that substantial evidence supported the ALJ's assessment of the claimant's residual functional capacity and medical opinions.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 5:25-cv-00860-DOC-DTB Unpublished

AMEZCUA V. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court order remanding a civil case to state court due to an insufficient amount in controversy. The appellate court held that the district court erred by excluding civil penalties and attorneys' fees from the jurisdictional threshold calculation without providing the defendant a fair opportunity to prove the amount.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. UNKNOWN-1783729812793 Unpublished

Ipina v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review regarding the denial of counsel to an immigration petitioner. The court remanded the case for a new hearing after finding the immigration judge failed to provide a reasonable time to secure legal representation.

Jul 10 2026
8th Cir. 25-2786 Panel Decision

David Hirsch v. Federal Prison Camp (FPC); Bill Eischen, Duluth Warden or current acting Warden

The Eighth Circuit affirmed the denial of a habeas petition challenging the Bureau of Prisons' calculation of First Step Act time credits. The court held that the Bureau correctly treated the petitioner's sentences as a single aggregate term due to a conviction under Section nineteen eighty-three of Title eighteen of the United States Code.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 20-72685 Unpublished

Lina Gomez Parra v. Todd Blanche

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review challenging an immigration judge's denial of asylum and withholding of removal. The court found the petitioner waived her right to counsel and failed to provide substantial evidence of government acquiescence to torture.