Decisions

Every decision we've summarized — searchable, filterable, neutral.

Jul 10 2026
Fed. Cir. 26-1043 Panel Decision

Pieczynski v. United States

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's claim against the United States for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court held that the plaintiff failed to identify a money-mandating source of law to support his claim for damages based on an alleged arbitration award.

Jul 10 2026
10th Cir. 2:24-CV-02533-DDC Panel Decision

Parker v. Bisignano

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. The plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not seeking review from the Social Security Administration's Appeals Council.

Jul 10 2026
Fed. Cir. 25-1107 Panel Decision

Limon v. Collins

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal from the Veterans Court due to lack of jurisdiction. The court held that the Veterans Court's remand order was not final and did not satisfy the conditions for immediate review.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 25-3016 Unpublished

Navaperez v. Nissan North America, Inc.

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court order remanding a case to state court due to an incorrect calculation of the amount in controversy. The appellate court held that the district court erred by excluding civil penalties and attorneys' fees from the jurisdictional threshold without providing the defendant a fair opportunity to prove the amount.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. UNKNOWN-1783729812793 Unpublished

Ipina v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review regarding the denial of counsel to an immigration petitioner. The court remanded the case for a new hearing after finding the immigration judge failed to provide a reasonable time to secure legal representation.

Jul 10 2026
9th Cir. 5:25-cv-00860-DOC-DTB Unpublished

AMEZCUA V. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

The Ninth Circuit vacated a district court order remanding a civil case to state court due to an insufficient amount in controversy. The appellate court held that the district court erred by excluding civil penalties and attorneys' fees from the jurisdictional threshold calculation without providing the defendant a fair opportunity to prove the amount.