Ahmed v. Hamtramck Public Schools
The Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's denial of leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint, holding that the proposed amendments regarding FMLA retaliation and Title IX discrimination were not futile.
Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's denial of leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint, holding that the proposed amendments regarding FMLA retaliation and Title IX discrimination were not futile.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the conviction and sixty-year sentence of Ricardo Delgado, a defendant convicted of participating in a drug trafficking conspiracy involving cocaine, fentanyl, and firearms.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges to the admission of expert testimony and the exclusion of evidence regarding legitimate billing practices.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges to the admission of expert testimony and the exclusion of evidence regarding legitimate billing practices.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges regarding expert testimony, evidence exclusion, and sentencing, finding no reversible error.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges regarding expert testimony, evidence exclusion, and sentencing, finding no reversible error.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges to the admission of expert testimony and the exclusion of evidence regarding legitimate billing practices.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling granting qualified immunity to police officers who shot a fleeing suspect in a convenience store. The court held that one officer did not seize the suspect because his shots missed and did not restrain the suspect, while the other officer reasonably believed the suspect posed an immediate threat.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in a civil rights action brought by a teacher against school officials and police officers. The court held that probable cause existed for at least some of the criminal charges filed against the plaintiff, barring his federal malicious prosecution claim.
The Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that a federal psychiatrist is not entitled to immunity under the Westfall Act for alleged sexual and romantic misconduct with a patient, while granting immunity for non-sexual professional negligence.