6th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Jun 12 2026
25-1104 Published

United States v. Hamaed

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges to the admission of expert testimony and the exclusion of evidence regarding legitimate billing practices.

Jun 12 2026
25-1056 Published

United States v. Hamaed

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges to the admission of expert testimony and the exclusion of evidence regarding legitimate billing practices.

Jun 12 2026
25-1099 Published

United States v. Hamaed

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges regarding expert testimony, evidence exclusion, and sentencing, finding no reversible error.

Jun 12 2026
25-1157 Published

United States v. Hamaed

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges regarding expert testimony, evidence exclusion, and sentencing, finding no reversible error.

Jun 12 2026
25-1353 Published

United States v. Hamaed

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the convictions of five pharmacists for a healthcare fraud scheme involving billing for prescriptions never dispensed. The court rejected challenges to the admission of expert testimony and the exclusion of evidence regarding legitimate billing practices.

Jun 12 2026
25-1653 Published

Ward v. Brotzke

The Sixth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling granting qualified immunity to police officers who shot a fleeing suspect in a convenience store. The court held that one officer did not seize the suspect because his shots missed and did not restrain the suspect, while the other officer reasonably believed the suspect posed an immediate threat.